Kentucky Senator Rand Pauls Plan To Sue The President Over

Kentucky Senator Rand Pauls Plan To Sue The President Over Kentucky Senator Rand Paul's Plan To Sue The President Over Implementation Of The Patriot Act – Article Example Senator Rand Paul plans to Sue the President Senator Rand feature as one of the latest politician to join an increasing crowd of Tea Party activists in opposition of call surveillance program by the US federal governmental agencies. Call surveillance program, which was brought into effect by the Foreign Intelligence Court, is a program that collects phone-call records in America. The leading governmental actors involved in implementing the program are National Security Agency (NSA) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). Both actors play a significant role in conducting national and international intelligence collection as a means of securing America from domestic and external acts of aggression and terrorism. Apart from the two agencies mentioned above, there are other non-governmental stakeholders including the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court. This court comprise of a 15-judge bench mandated to handle cases revolving around international intelligence programs. In 200 6, this non-governmental actor authorized the use of Call Surveillance by American federal government. Based on the article, it is undeniable that the senator’s case falls under the larger issue of freedom restriction and extra-judicial killings. Similar to Rand’s case, all other stakeholders making the increasing plaintiffs team are concerned about the legality of conducting targeted drone killings, especially when call surveillance features as the basis of justifying such actions.Conventionally, every story contains multiple sides. Plaintiffs opposing implementation of call surveillance program claims that the federal government is stepping out of its constitutional mandates. Rand Paul argues that the program is unconstitutional and violates certain clauses of the laws, especially the Fourth Amendment. On the contrary, the defendant, in this case the Obama’s administration, claims that the program is legal based on the previous ruling by the Foreign Intelligen ce Surveillance Court. With respect to stages of policy processes, the call surveillance program is currently in the implementation step. This is based on the fact that the FBI and NSA are currently using the program in conducting its investigations, both at domestic and international levels. The Justice Department has already issued orders directing phone companies to record all phone calls. After reading the news article, I am of the opinion that the call surveillance program violates fundamental rights of American citizens. The fact that the Justice Department have appealed earlier ruling by the Supreme Court indicates that recording of phone calls lies contrary to certain inherent amendments in American constitution. In this regard, it is undeniable that there are no missing facts about the case because all plaintiffs are presenting their argument from similar perspectives. Work CitedSavage, Charlie. (February 12, 2014). Rand Paul Files Lawsuit over N.S.A. Call Surveillance. The New York Times. Web February 22, 2014. nytimes.com/2014/02/13/us/politics/rand-paul-files-lawsuit-over-nsa-call-surveillance.html?_r=0