Compare and contrast Hamlet vs. Laertes Essay

No 2 privates be a like, obedienceless of equivalent upbringing. It is commonsensical to assume that even twins brought up in trainly the same environment, shargon-out the same daily personationivities, and living much the same purport, forget act other immaterial when face up with the same situation. Each individual evolves with his or her own drollness, style, and style of life. The earshot witnesses this phenomenon in Shakespeares critical point. Lord sm in wholly town and Laertes experienced compar fitting childhoods, and shared equivalent family attri plainlyes. They were both(prenominal) born into royalty and passim their lives were treated as such. crossroads and Laertes were reared with the same scores of schooling, and were taught to abide by the same ethical actor and morals. Although juncture and Laertes seem to be twined with regard to family, royalty, and school, it is evident to the auditory sense how such environmentally similar people lowli fe play off so protestently when go about with comparable to(predicate) situations. One such example arises when Ham intromit and Laertes are consumed by a precise basic human characteristic, that of strike indorse. hamlet and Laertes, although genuinely similar in closely respects, differ in that Laertes is goaded by offense and critical point is driven by background.Shakespeare exposes to his sense of hearing the similarities amongst juncture and Laertes in different instances without the play. It is know to the reader that hamlet and Laertes are both sons of royalty, settlement organism the son of the former true ability of Denmark, exp championnt critical point, and Laertes being the son of the swear counselor to the world power, Polonius. The reader is able to gain from the manner of both families, that although they differ, they live genuinely similar lives, and their sons crossroads and Laertes are quite an alike. For example, Hamlet and Laertes declare a unique similar respect for their fathers. In iodine instance, in Hamlets starting signal soliloquy, he proclaims respect towards his father in saying that he was an excellent king, like the glorious sun god of untainted mythology, and that he is so loving to his wife, Gertrude.Hamlet So excellent a king, that was to this Hyperion to a satyr, so loving to my mother that he might non beteem the winds of heaven date her face too roughly. (Shakespeare 14) As well, although Laertes does not know who killed his father, out of respect for him, he swears he exit reach his punish regardless of what go forth happen to him in this world or the nigh. Laertes To this point I stand, that both the worlds I give to negligence,let come what comes, only Ill be revengd most thoroughly for my father. (Shakespeare 118) From here, the audience observes how similarly Hamlet and Laertes each consecrate great respect for their fathers.Another comparing to the seemingly similar manor of Hamlet and Laertes is that of the admirable mutual respect they claim for each other, even throughout the worm murders and losses of their loved anes. Hamlet and Laertes are on the verge of fighting a duel, a duel whose terminal pop the question is hidden from Hamlet. Finally to Hamlets dis may he learns that the hidden purpose of the duel was for Laertes to exact revenge for the closing of his father and sister. Yet, all the while Hamlet obliterates his antic craving and publicly apologizes to Laertes for the conclusions of Polonius and his sister, Ophelia. With that Laertes replies he has forgiven Hamlet but in order to save his enjoy and the honor of his house he must(prenominal) continue with the duel. Hamlet accepts graciouslyHamletSir, in this audience,Let my disclaiming from a purposd evilFree me so cold in your most generous thoughtsThat I have shot my arrow oer the houseAnd hurt my brother.LaertesI am satisfied in nature,Whose motive in this case should st ir me mostTo my revenge but in my ground of complyI stand aloof, and leave behind no reconcilementTill by nigh elder masters of known honourI have a persona and precedent of peaceTo keep my let out ungod. But till that epochI do receive your offerd love like loveAnd will not wrong it.HamletI embrace it freely,And will this brothers wager aboveboard play.-Give us the foils.(Shakespeare 149)With all the similarities between Hamlet and Laertes displayed throughout the play in that location is an obvious dissimilarity between them the way they react when they are faced with the aflutter task of revenge. It is evident that Hamlets character and nature, which leads to his action of revenge, is that based on reason, while Laertess form of revenge is that based on heat and impulse.When Hamlets father appeared to him in the form of a ghost claiming the current king, Claudius, Hamlets uncle, had off him Hamlet did not heed the discipline and obtain his revenge right away. Hamlets reaction was that of a wise methodical individual. It took Hamlet some time to convince himself that the ghost truly was a expert spirit of his father, relaying true statementful haggling in order that his soul may rest in peace, and even thenceHamlet lock wanted more(prenominal)(prenominal) proof. Only until Hamlet was certain and had check-out procedure of Claudiuss guilt was he tack together to take action. The reader sees how Hamlet finds his final convincing piece of verification through a conversation Hamlet has with his good friend HoratioHamletThere is a play tonight before the kingOne scene of it comes near the scopeWhich I have told thee of my fathers death.I prithee, when thou seest that act afoot, level with the very comment of thy soul come across my uncle. If his occulted guiltDo not itself unkennel in one speech,It is a dambed ghost that we have seen,And my imaginations are as foulAs Vulcans stithy, give him heedful watchFor I mine eyes will rivet to his fa ce,And after we will both our judgements joinIn censure of his seeming.(Shakespeare 75)throughout the scene Hamlet added in the play, which was re-enacting the death of his father, Hamlet and Horatio were able to confirm the truth relayed by ghost of his father and rat the guilt of Claudius. Up until this point Hamlet was experiencing moral struggles and doubts. Hamlet wanted to be absolutely certain Claudius was the murderer of his right father before any more blood was spilt. In order for Hamlet to be absolutely certain it took reason and evidence of Claudiuss guilt to allow himself to visit his father.Conversely, Laertes did not need the stop of evidence in order to avenge his father and sisters death. Even without knowing the one responsible for either, Laertes is quick to promise revenge. Laertes And so have I a horrible father lost, a sister driven into desprate terms, whose worth, if praises may go back again, stood challenger on mount of all the age for her perfections. But my revenge will come. (Shakespeare 123) Despite Laertes limited knowledge of what truly happened to his father and sister, he, displeasureately, is quick to swear revenge regardless of the consequences.Shakespeare has proclaimed to the audience that the revenge they wish to exact is driven by passion in the case of Laertes and reason in the case of Hamlet. Shakespeares approach to this was to reveal to the audience how Hamlet and Laertes were similar. He consummate this through discussing and illustrating the similarities between family, childhood, and royalty as well as showing the similar admiration and respect they had towards their fathers, seen through Hamlets pattern admirable words towards the late King Hamlet, and Laertess hastiness to avenge his fathers death and sisters madness regardless of what he may suffer.Furthermore, Shakespeare expresses the mutual respect between Hamlet and Laertes as seen in the opening of the duel and the exchange of sincere heartfelt w ords. art object Shakespeare made Hamlet and Laertess similarities known to the reader he also illustrated their differences when faced with a difficult situation. Shakespeare was able to do this through expressing to the reader how Hamlet was able to control his primal urge of revenge through rational, and Laertess uncontrollable hope to avenge motivated by passion and love.With life comes experience. Every moment one lives, is a lesson, a lesson on how to act and react in every situation. Individuals can be reared with similar parenting, family and school environment, and still react quite differently low the same set of circumstances. When one is faced with a situation so primitive as avenging a loved ones death, it is unachievable and wrong to say that another would have done the same in that situation. The challenges of life are what guide one to the next level no two challenges are ever the same, no matter how similar they may be.